“Automated-manual” is how the automatic option is described by Honda.
For an engineering-led company like Honda this seems to promise something tasty. Might this be something like the wonderful dual-clutch DSG by Volkswagen Audi. In a word, NO. The telling statistic is that it takes an extra 1.5 seconds to get to 0-60 than in the manual. That’s 20% longer in the sprint to 60. Where does that extra time go? Well both manual and automatic have 6 gears and the same gear ratios, so there can’t be any differences there. That points to weak electronics-hydraulics behind the clutch and gear change. Rather than making these aspects stronger than the manual like Volkswagen has with the DSG, Honda have released a gearbox weak in this department. All the road tests which I have read of the iShift Civic, use adjectives like, slow, jerky and clumsy when describing the gear change in auto mode. And they all recommend opting for the manual and saving £700 in the process.
Come on Honda. We expected better.
Return to Amistad Home.
This article is sponsored by Proqul Ozone store who supply the Ozonology Sanitisation service.
Other aarticles you may enjoy.
About Cars:
Honda Accord 2008 is no looker,
W124 E-class is still the best Mercedes,
Takeover of Land Rover & Jaguar,
Jaguar for sale,
Mercedes and Chrysler divorce,
Ebay addiction, can I make a profit?,
My list of most beautiful cars,
Volvo's not-so-floating console,
Why rare cars or exclusive cars will lose you money,
Honda FRV review,
Toyota IQ to help Mercedes' profits,
Ferrari F599: Motoring Porn,
Peugeot enter the SUV market,
Honda Jazz report,
Eulogy for Rover SD1,
BMW 535D is a colossus,
Honda Fit in the USA,
Ford Focus is the perfect second hand car,
The Honda Legend returns,
C6: the new DS,
Is Audi going RWD?,
The smarter Smart,
What happened to the promise of active suspension,
Honda Civic ishift.
About life:
Climate change is a natural phenomena,
Green tax or just plain tax?,
Was passing the EU budget good for Britain? I think not.
|